Posted on

British Labor Party “election interference” controversy in the US

British Labor Party “election interference” controversy in the US

Donald Trump denounced “blatant foreign interference.” Presidential election through the Labor Party des United Kingdom. The Republican candidate formally filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) during his collaboration Kamala Harris with a British group that wants to “kill Musk’s Twitter.”

As for Trump, the complaint cited media reports of contacts between the Labor Party and Kamala Harris and argued that the volunteer efforts amounted to illegal “donations.” Specifically, the text mentions people with ties to the Labor Party who are traveling to the United States to campaign for the Democrat.

After more than a decade in opposition, the Labor Party recently returned to power. The resounding victory of Keir Starmer The July election saw the party return to Downing Street, where it had not set foot since 2010.

Kamala Harris’ Advisory Group Wants to ‘Kill Musk’s Twitter’

“The British are interfering in our elections!” Racket News, the media company of Matt Taibbi, a journalist who became famous for the “Twitter Files,” recently reported.

The information came through the leak of internal documents Center to Combat Digital Hate (CCDH), its founder, Morgan McSweeneyis an advisor to Kamala Harris’ campaign. Documents obtained show that the group has written plans to “kill Musk’s Twitter feed,” a phrase that appears in its internal monthly agenda.

Illegal immigration: Archive image of an immigration of African immigrants

CCDH acts as a communications link between Keir Starmer’s government and Labor Together, the party’s think tank. Both the group and the think tank were founded by McSweeney, whose role has been compared to that of Karl Robe and George W. Bush.

“The CCDH documents are particularly significant because McSweeney’s Labor Together staff taught election strategy to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, leading Politico to call Labor and the Democrats ‘sister parties.'” “CCDH’s focus on ‘Kill.’ “Musk’s ‘Twitter’ also raises legal questions about the nonprofit’s tax-exempt status as a 501(c)(3) organization,” the aforementioned outlet added.

As for CCDH’s plans with social media, Racket News reported that its ambitions are to regulate its reach in the United States.

“CCDH also held meetings with federal lawmakers and pushed for a ‘change in the US’ toward a censored proposal it calls the ‘STAR Framework’ that would create an ‘independent digital regulator’ that ‘could have consequences for harmful content.’ ‘. STAR’s core concepts are similar to the Digital Services Act just introduced in Europe and the even stricter UK Online Safety Act, which tasks national media regulator Ofcom with setting fines for uncooperative platforms,” ​​they said.