Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Republican Sen. JD Vance of Ohio faced off on Tuesday night’s “CBS News Vice Presidential Debate.”

The nearly two-hour debate remained mostly cordial — Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump agreed on several points. However, it was Vance’s refusal to acknowledge that Trump had lost the 2020 presidential election that drew Walz’s ire toward the end of the debate.

“He [Trump] “Still says he didn’t lose the election…Did he lose the 2020 election?” Walz asked Vance.

“Tim, I’m focused on the future,” Vance replied.

“That’s a damn non-answer,” Walz interjected.

Vance added that he and Trump agreed there were problems in 2020 and that they would be “happy to talk about it.”

RELATED STORY | Scripps News fact-checks the Walz-Vance vice presidential debate

The Middle East

The debate covered a range of topics, but none was more internationally pressing than the Iranian missile attack on Israel.

The first question the moderators asked Walz was whether he would “support or oppose a preemptive strike by Israel against Iran.”

Walz, who appeared nervous, paused several times but said, “Israel’s ability to defend itself is absolutely fundamental.”

Walz explained that a second Trump presidency would pose a danger to the world.

“What we’ve seen from Vice President Harris is consistent leadership,” Walz said.

“Donald Trump has ensured stability in the world, and he has achieved this by establishing an effective deterrent,” Vance responded.

“It is up to Israel what it believes must be done to ensure the security of its country, and we should support our allies wherever they are,” the senator added.

immigration

“We have to stop the bleeding,” Vance said of immigration. “We have a historic immigration crisis because Kamala Harris started out saying she wanted to reverse all of Donald Trump’s border policies.”

Vance defended Trump’s proposal for mass deportations.

“We start with the criminal migrants,” Vance said. “You start deporting these people. Then you make it harder for illegal immigrants to undercut the wages of American workers.”

Walz responded by accusing former President Donald Trump of working against a solution.

“We had the fairest and toughest immigration law this country has ever seen,” Walz said, referring to the bipartisan immigration bill that was up for consideration in early 2024. “Donald Trump said no.”

“Give the bill, [Harris] “I’ll sign it,” Walz said.

Vance has been under pressure over Springfield, Ohio, where Trump amplified false claims that immigrants eat pets during the last presidential debate.

“The people I am most concerned about in Springfield, Ohio, are the American citizens whose lives have been destroyed by Kamala Harris’ open border,” Vance said.

The economy

Walz highlighted Harris’ economic plans, including down payment assistance for homebuyers and lower costs for medications like insulin.

“Kamala Harris said we should do the things she wants to do, we’ll just ask the wealthiest to pay their fair share. When you do that, our system works best, more people participate, and people have the things they want and need,” Walz said.

Vance said that Trump’s historic tax cuts as president “were designed to pay higher wages to the middle class and working class in the United States.”

“This is a record I am proud of, and we will return to this common sense wisdom so that you can afford to live the American dream again,” Vance said.

Reproductive rights

Walz tried to portray a second Trump administration as extreme on abortion.

“In Minnesota we have Roe v. “Wade restored,” Walz said, explaining that the state had ensured abortion protections for women after the Supreme Court struck down federal protections in 2024.

“This is a basic human right,” Walz said. “This is about health care.”

Vance tried to take a more nuanced position at the national level — as Trump posted on social media that he would not sign a national abortion ban if elected.

“We need to do a much better job of regaining the trust of the American people on this issue, when, frankly, they simply don’t trust us,” Senator Vance said. “I want us as the Republican Party to be family-friendly in the truest sense of the word.”

“The right way to deal with this, as chaotic as democracy can be at times, is to let voters make those decisions. Let individual states determine their abortion policies,” Vance said.

Gun violence

“The vast majority of gun violence in this country is committed with illegally purchased firearms,” Vance said. “Unfortunately, I believe that we need to increase security in our schools.”

“The idea that we can magically wave a magic wand and take weapons out of the hands of bad guys – that just doesn’t fit with recent experience. We need to make our schools safer, and I think we need to do that.” “There are some common-sense, bipartisan solutions on how to do that,” Vance said.

“We understand that the Second Amendment exists, but our first responsibility is to our children to figure that out,” Walz said. “There are common sense things we can do to make a difference.”

“We have that and we should look at all the problems,” Walz said. But “sometimes it’s just the guns. It’s just the weapons.”

“I think there is an opportunity to find solutions that work — protect the Second Amendment, protect our children. That’s our priority,” Walz said.

The cost of healthcare

“Of course we will cover Americans with pre-existing conditions,” Vance said of a possible Trump administration.

Vance said Trump’s success has helped keep health care cost increases low and created better price transparency in the market.

He also defended Trump’s “concepts of a plan” claim from the presidential debate.

“They are not going to propose a 900-page bill that is on the debate stage. It would bore everyone to tears,” Vance said.

Governor Walz noted that as a legislator he helped draft the Affordable Care Act and that Trump, as president, tried to repeal the measure.

“What [Republicans] They say, ‘If you’re healthy, why should you pay more?’ So what they’re going to do is let the insurance companies choose who they insure.”

Family vacation and childcare

Walz said Harris is making parental leave for new children and health needs an administration priority.

“What we are saying is that the economy works best when it works for all of us,” Walz said.

“When it comes to child care, you have to consider supply and demand,” he said. “We need to make it easier for people to get into this business and then make sure people can pay for it.”

Vance recalled his wife’s own experiences with paid family leave.

“The cultural pressures on young families, especially young women, make it really difficult for people to choose the family model they want,” Vance said. “We should have a family care model that allows for choice.”

“We want to promote choice in providing family care and supporting child care,” Vance said.

Closing statements

“Senator Vance has made it clear that he will support Donald Trump’s agenda. He will continue to pursue this path. Kamala Harris gives us another option,” Walz said in his closing statements. “It brings real solutions to the middle class and puts you at the center.”

“I’ve been in politics long enough to do what Kamala Harris does when she stands before the American people and says she’s going to work on all of these challenges from day one,” Vance said. “She has been vice president for three and a half years. The first day was 1,400 days ago. And their policies have made these problems worse.”

“We need a new direction. We need a president who has done it before, and done it well,” Vance said.

RELATED STORY | These polls showed a clear winner in Tuesday’s presidential debate, but is history on their side?

Bite-sized cafe It’s Recess brings back tried-and-true sandwich fillings like BLT, chicken avo, curried egg or ham and cheese, as well as Samboy chips, lolly snakes and excellent coffee.

Save

You have reached the maximum number of saved articles.

Remove items from your saved list to add more.

Save this article for later

Add items to your saved list and refer back to them at any time.

Got it

From our partners

If the 2024 vice presidential debate goes down in history as the last presidential debate ever in a general election, that won’t be a bad ending. It was a civil, policy-heavy debate in which Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance went to unusual lengths to emphasize that they agreed with many of each other’s statements. After the debate, the candidates talked again and introduced their wives to each other. It was almost as if Donald Trump had never descended the escalator into politics.

But he did, and to what extent this undercard debate will matter in the end – I have a hot guess! – it could benefit Trump, the single politician who has done the most to destroy the idea of ​​political debate as a moderate exchange of ideas.

It’s not that Walz was terrible. He was fine. However, Vance was in control for most of the evening, being more nimble and skilled in the debates while also being able to present his case for a second Trump administration in a way that didn’t scare the kids.

For the most of the night.

Walz’s crucial failure was not that he lost a train of thought here or there, or that he was clearly nervous and nervous at the start of the debate. They were missed opportunities allowed Vance comes through with his portrayal of the Trump campaign — and its desires for the country — as common sense for your family.

Vance repeatedly managed to put Walz on the defensive on issues important to Democrats.

Most Americans believe climate change is a major problem. It’s not their top priority, but the belief among Republican politicians that human-caused climate change may not exist is seen, to use a rolling coin, as strange. Vance was asked at the start of the debate how the Trump administration would reduce the impacts of climate change. Vance argued that it was reasonable for people to be concerned about “crazy weather patterns” but only cited carbon emissions as a cause of climate change “for the sake of argument.” If something like that happens, he said, the plan should be to move more production from China to the U.S. and produce cleaner energy there.

“And unfortunately,” he said, “Kamala Harris has done exactly the opposite.”

Walz’s response to that could have been, “What the hell are you talking about?” Do you believe climate change is happening, as you said “for the sake of argument,” or not? And by the way, how does Harris reverse the relocation of domestic production if that was a problem – if it wasn’t? The– central goal of the adopted Biden economic agenda? Instead, Walz went through a litany of statistics and talked about some of the weather mitigation measures they are implementing in Minnesota.

Another example: The Trump administration reached its legislative nadir when it attempted to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. It was a hugely unpopular effort that Republicans were lucky enough to have then-Sen. John McCain goes back and shoots. While Vance delivered some of his health policy answers fluently, he made the incredible claim that Trump “saved” the ACA.

“You don’t have to agree with everything President Trump has ever said or done,” Vance said, “but when Obamacare collapsed under the weight of its own regulatory burden and health care costs, Donald Trump could have destroyed the program.” Instead, he took a bipartisan approach ensured Americans had access to affordable health care.” Interesting! I was at the Capitol almost every day during the arduous seven-month effort by Trump and congressional Republicans to repeal Obamacare and somehow completely missed the fact that he was working on a bipartisan basis to save it.

Walz certainly expressed some of these points, but without any meaningful outrage. And as the back-and-forth over Obamacare continued, Vance was able to turn the tables on Walz and ask him, “Do you think the individual requirement is a good idea?” Walz seemed unsure how to answer, saying, “I do.” “I think the idea of ​​making sure the risk pool is wide enough to cover everyone is the only way insurance works.”

In episodes like this, it seemed like Walz spent most of his time during Vance’s answers getting the stats and canned lines he had for each topic without Hear to Vance and Counter-Strike. Vance, who was tested a lot in front of the press more than Walz in the last few months, heard everything. When Walz mentioned twice at the outset the need to listen to the “experts” in various fields, Vance did not miss his point in rebuttal. He went on a tirade about how many “experts” have made mistakes over the years, particularly in manufacturing policy as globalization occurs.

“And for the first time in a generation,” said Vance, “Donald Trump had the wisdom and courage to say to this bipartisan consensus: We’re not doing this anymore.” interesting To say that Trump governed by doing whatever seemed good to him at any given time is the right rhetorical approach for a presidential race that will be decided in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

On the cost of child care, Vance gave a thesis presentation in which he shared his thoughts on the topic. Walz noted, as he often did, that he didn’t think he and Vance were “that far apart” and then gave his own thesis presentation. Instead, Walz could have noted that Donald Trump has never thought about child care policy for a second in his life, except that Ivanka Trump was interested in it.

Walz’s worst moment in the debate – when he really got into a mess and not just missed an opportunity – came when he was asked about his repeated misstatements over the years during the Tiananmen Square massacre 1989 in Hong Kong was when he was actually in Nebraska. Walz gave a long-winded answer that avoided the question. He then admitted in his follow-up that he had “misspoken” on the matter, before repeating: “He was in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protests.” It was one of those moments that highlighted the weakness of the strategy of the Harris’ campaign has increased the practice of regularly hiding its directors from critical situations rather than giving them the opportunity to do so practice in them.

At the very end of the debate, however, Walz seemed to get it — and managed to bring out Vance’s worst moment of the night and provide a crucial insight for the Harris campaign.

In this case, Walz was paying attention when, when asked about Trump’s efforts to steal the 2020 election, Vance displayed his usual cool and calmly portrayed it as a major misunderstanding. Walz pounced, and effectively. While Walz noted that the two may “agree” on some other issues, he said, “This is where we are miles apart.” This was a threat to our democracy in a way we had never seen before. And it manifested itself in Donald Trump not being able to say, as he still says, that he didn’t lose the election. I would just ask: Did he lose the 2020 election?”

“Tim, I’m focused on the future,” Vance said. “Did Kamala Harris stop Americans from expressing their opinions in the wake of the 2020 COVID situation?”

“That’s a damn non-answer,” Walz retorted.

Because no matter how many people watched this debate, Vance may have improved his image. He may have been able to calm nerves about a second Trump administration. Walz may have been on the wrong foot all night. But in the end, Walz got this Clip.

Need advice on how to get through this historic and nerve-wracking presidential election? Slate wants to help. Submit your questions to Wedge Issues here. It’s anonymous! No question is too stupid – or too existential.

Oct. 6

Santa Rosa: Adults are welcome to attend the Environmental Discovery Center’s after-hours event. You can deepen your knowledge and appreciation of the local environment as the Spring Lake center transforms into a space filled with glowing lights and interactive exhibits. Bring snacks and water. 5-7 p.m. For free. Parking is $7 or free with a Sonoma County Regional Parks pass. 393 Violetti Rd. sonomacountyparks.org

Oct. 9

Napa: Join us for the third session of the Fall 2024 Water-Wise Landscaping workshop series presented by City of Napa Water to learn the eight principles of water-wise landscaping. UC Master Gardeners will examine soil types and demonstrate how to improve soil through aeration, soil improvers and mulch. Participants have the chance to win prizes. 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Free. 2296 Streblow Drive. cityofnapa.org

Oct. 11

Kenwood: Join Desi Harp, a member of the Mishewal Wappo Tribe, for the October lecture series exploring the history of the Wappo way of life. Meet at the picnic area. 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. Tickets are priced on a sliding scale between $10 and $14 for general admission, $5 for students ages 12 to 17, Sugarloaf Ridge State Park members and volunteers, and are free for Children under 12 years. 2605 Adobe Canyon Rd. simpletix.com

Oct. 12

Gualala: Join Sonoma County Parks staff at their Saturday “Walk in the Park” event at Gualala Point Regional Park. Discover the history of the coastal park’s fauna and flora. Meet at the Gualala Park Visitor Center. Bring water and snacks. No registration required. 10-11:30 a.m. For free. Parking is $7 or free with a Sonoma County Regional Parks pass. 42401 Coast Highway 1. sonomacountyparks.org

Santa Rosa: Join Pepperwood Education Director Emeritus Steve Barnhart to identify species and examine the biology and ecology of Pepperwood Preserve. Attendees will explore the natural history of oak trees through a presentation by Barnhart. This event involves a two-mile moderate hike with some steep climbs and uneven surfaces. Meet at the Dwight Center. Pets not allowed. 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. $35 per person. 2130 Pepperwood Preserve Road. Pepperwoodpreserve.org

Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Republican Sen. JD Vance of Ohio faced off on Tuesday night’s “CBS News Vice Presidential Debate.”

The nearly two-hour debate remained mostly cordial — Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump agreed on several points. However, it was Vance’s refusal to acknowledge that Trump had lost the 2020 presidential election that drew Walz’s ire toward the end of the debate.

“He [Trump] “Still says he didn’t lose the election…Did he lose the 2020 election?” Walz asked Vance.

“Tim, I’m focused on the future,” Vance replied.

“That’s a damn non-answer,” Walz interjected.

Vance added that he and Trump agreed there were problems in 2020 and that they would be “happy to talk about it.”

RELATED STORY | Scripps News fact-checks the Walz-Vance vice presidential debate

The Middle East

The debate covered a range of topics, but none was more internationally pressing than the Iranian missile attack on Israel.

The first question the moderators asked Walz was whether he would “support or oppose a preemptive strike by Israel against Iran.”

Walz, who appeared nervous, paused several times but said, “Israel’s ability to defend itself is absolutely fundamental.”

Walz explained that a second Trump presidency would pose a danger to the world.

“What we’ve seen from Vice President Harris is consistent leadership,” Walz said.

“Donald Trump has ensured stability in the world, and he has achieved this by establishing an effective deterrent,” Vance responded.

“It is up to Israel what it believes must be done to ensure the security of its country, and we should support our allies wherever they are,” the senator added.

immigration

“We have to stop the bleeding,” Vance said of immigration. “We have a historic immigration crisis because Kamala Harris started out saying she wanted to reverse all of Donald Trump’s border policies.”

Vance defended Trump’s proposal for mass deportations.

“We start with the criminal migrants,” Vance said. “You start deporting these people. Then you make it harder for illegal immigrants to undercut the wages of American workers.”

Walz responded by accusing former President Donald Trump of working against a solution.

“We had the fairest and toughest immigration law this country has ever seen,” Walz said, referring to the bipartisan immigration bill that was up for consideration in early 2024. “Donald Trump said no.”

“Give the bill, [Harris] “I’ll sign it,” Walz said.

Vance has been under pressure over Springfield, Ohio, where Trump amplified false claims that immigrants eat pets during the last presidential debate.

“The people I am most concerned about in Springfield, Ohio, are the American citizens whose lives have been destroyed by Kamala Harris’ open border,” Vance said.

The economy

Walz highlighted Harris’ economic plans, including down payment assistance for homebuyers and lower costs for medications like insulin.

“Kamala Harris said we should do the things she wants to do, we’ll just ask the wealthiest to pay their fair share. When you do that, our system works best, more people participate, and people have the things they want and need,” Walz said.

Vance said that Trump’s historic tax cuts as president “were designed to pay higher wages to the middle class and working class in the United States.”

“This is a record I am proud of, and we will return to this common sense wisdom so that you can afford to live the American dream again,” Vance said.

Reproductive rights

Walz tried to portray a second Trump administration as extreme on abortion.

“In Minnesota we have Roe v. “Wade restored,” Walz said, explaining that the state had ensured abortion protections for women after the Supreme Court struck down federal protections in 2024.

“This is a basic human right,” Walz said. “This is about health care.”

Vance tried to take a more nuanced position at the national level — as Trump posted on social media that he would not sign a national abortion ban if elected.

“We need to do a much better job of regaining the trust of the American people on this issue, when, frankly, they simply don’t trust us,” Senator Vance said. “I want us as the Republican Party to be family-friendly in the truest sense of the word.”

“The right way to deal with this, as chaotic as democracy can be at times, is to let voters make those decisions. Let individual states determine their abortion policies,” Vance said.

Gun violence

“The vast majority of gun violence in this country is committed with illegally purchased firearms,” Vance said. “Unfortunately, I believe that we need to increase security in our schools.”

“The idea that we can magically wave a magic wand and take weapons out of the hands of bad guys – that just doesn’t fit with recent experience. We need to make our schools safer, and I think we need to do that.” “There are some common-sense, bipartisan solutions on how to do that,” Vance said.

“We understand that the Second Amendment exists, but our first responsibility is to our children to figure that out,” Walz said. “There are common sense things we can do to make a difference.”

“We have that and we should look at all the problems,” Walz said. But “sometimes it’s just the guns. It’s just the weapons.”

“I think there is an opportunity to find solutions that work — protect the Second Amendment, protect our children. That’s our priority,” Walz said.

The cost of healthcare

“Of course we will cover Americans with pre-existing conditions,” Vance said of a possible Trump administration.

Vance said Trump’s success has helped keep health care cost increases low and created better price transparency in the market.

He also defended Trump’s “concepts of a plan” claim from the presidential debate.

“They are not going to propose a 900-page bill that is on the debate stage. It would bore everyone to tears,” Vance said.

Governor Walz noted that as a legislator he helped draft the Affordable Care Act and that Trump, as president, tried to repeal the measure.

“What [Republicans] They say, ‘If you’re healthy, why should you pay more?’ So what they’re going to do is let the insurance companies choose who they insure.”

Family vacation and childcare

Walz said Harris is making parental leave for new children and health needs an administration priority.

“What we are saying is that the economy works best when it works for all of us,” Walz said.

“When it comes to child care, you have to consider supply and demand,” he said. “We need to make it easier for people to get into this business and then make sure people can pay for it.”

Vance recalled his wife’s own experiences with paid family leave.

“The cultural pressures on young families, especially young women, make it really difficult for people to choose the family model they want,” Vance said. “We should have a family care model that allows for choice.”

“We want to promote choice in providing family care and supporting child care,” Vance said.

Closing statements

“Senator Vance has made it clear that he will support Donald Trump’s agenda. He will continue to pursue this path. Kamala Harris gives us another option,” Walz said in his closing statements. “It brings real solutions to the middle class and puts you at the center.”

“I’ve been in politics long enough to do what Kamala Harris does when she stands before the American people and says she’s going to work on all of these challenges from day one,” Vance said. “She has been vice president for three and a half years. The first day was 1,400 days ago. And their policies have made these problems worse.”

“We need a new direction. We need a president who has done it before, and done it well,” Vance said.

RELATED STORY | These polls showed a clear winner in Tuesday’s presidential debate, but is history on their side?

FLINT, Michigan — Larry Safford is well known in his central Michigan community.

He’s a veteran, a former crime-scene specialist and a John Wayne super-fan. The 85-year-old farmer is also nearing the end of sweet corn and raspberry season, and his 20 acres of land is full of new and old customers. He gives away pumpkins to kids in the fall and plows snow for his neighbors in the winter.

In many ways, Safford represents an American vision of the stereotypical Midwesterner: Honest, hardworking, kind. He told USA TODAY the region he calls home means bad weather and football — and no, not everyone is nice.

Manchester United are in the middle of another storm, with Erik ten Hag under increasing pressure following dressing room leaks and disappointing results. Fans and media are already speculating about the future, with former striker Ruud van Nistelrooy being considered as a possible replacement. As discussed on the latest United Stand show, hosted by Mark Goldbridge, a wave of discontent is brewing at the club, with players reportedly criticizing ten Hag’s tactics and questioning his leadership.

Players vs. Managers: The toxicity remains

On the latest episode of The United Stand, Mark Goldbridge didn’t hold back. He revealed that there is “already a movement in the fan base that Ruud van Nistelrooy is not the guy” to replace ten Hag, despite rumors circulating that the Dutchman was ready to take the job at Manchester United. But Goldbridge warns that even if van Nistelrooy intervenes, “the toxicity will continue.” His assessment points to deeper problems within the squad that have plagued the club for a decade.

Citing recent reports, Goldbridge mentioned leaks following last season’s FA Cup final, where players expressed their dissatisfaction with ten Hag’s style of play. According to Goldbridge, “not a single player said the manager should necessarily stay or go”, but the complaint was unanimous: teams like Sheffield United and Burnley “shouldn’t come to Old Trafford and leave us open.” This sentiment reflects a recurring theme Manchester United Respond: Players Undermine Managers, Leading to Another Potential Manager Loss.

Ruud van Nistelrooy: Man United’s next manager?

Dutch reports have linked van Nistelrooy with the job and, according to Goldbridge, that’s no surprise: “Of course he’d bloody do it [want the job]“But the question remains whether the fan base would really support him. While van Nistelrooy is a legend at the club, Goldbridge expressed doubts, stating: “I don’t think they will be happy with Van Nistelrooy either.” Many fans are already wary after seeing Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s experiment unfold an initial honeymoon phase failed.

Goldbridge pointed out the striking similarities between the current situation and Solskjaer’s appointment. Both have been hailed as club legends with the potential to revitalize the team’s fortunes, but it appears that sentiment alone is not enough to succeed in a modern Premier League full of tactical demands. He summed it up bluntly: “It’s almost a psychological failure before it even begins.”

Internal Conflicts: A Club Divided

One of the most worrying revelations came from respected journalist Andy Mitten, who reported that players were increasingly expressing their dissatisfaction with ten Hag’s methods. Goldbridge described the behavior as “insidious” and “sneaky”, particularly given the lack of accountability of some players: “They talk like they’re Prime Roberto Baggio or Kevin De Bruyne.”

This internal division is not new. Goldbridge commented on a long-standing problem within the club: “I wouldn’t be wrong if I said that at Manchester United over the last few years we’ve somehow put together the most demanding group of players we’ve ever had, and at very little back it up.” He argued that players’ opinions on tactical matters should be taken with a grain of salt given their own poor performances. “They couldn’t pass five meters… they couldn’t take a bath,” he added, sharply criticizing the team’s lack of basic skills.

Diploma

While Erik ten Hag’s future is at stake, the possible appointment of Ruud van Nistelrooy is of great importance. However, as Mark Goldbridge aptly pointed out, a change in leadership will not solve the deeper cultural problems plaguing Manchester United. Team demands, leaks to the press and constant scapegoating of managers have created a toxic environment that continues regardless of who is in the dugout. For many fans, it’s not just about replacing ten Hag or supporting van Nistelrooy – it’s about rebuilding the club’s structure from within.

LOS ANGELES — At the end of a nearly 12-minute media session Tuesday, Ikaika Malloe’s eyes began to water.

UCLA’s defensive coordinator spoke on several topics after practice Tuesday, but one thing was abundantly clear: He placed responsibility for the defensive miscues the team suffered in the first four games of the season.

“I love this defense because I feel like I’m a part of them. You worked so hard to give me what I want, you know,” Malloe said. “And on the other hand, man, I just can’t, I mean, I’ve been up since three o’clock on Sunday because I just don’t want to let this team down. These kids fight hard, man. And I think the love for each other is what keeps us going. But basically, that’s technically my job. I just have to get these kids better so we can win.”

After Malloe left the media scrum, defender Bryan Addison took his place and commented on how emotional his coach became when talking about the team.

“Coach Malloe is one of those coaches who is easy to play for. “He’s so passionate about his players and his defense that he takes pride in what he does and what he teaches us,” Addison said. “Seeing the way he carries himself and how passionate he is about the game just makes me want to play for him even more.”

The Bruins’ defense struggled in four games, particularly against the pass, giving up 291 yards per game. UCLA ranks 117th in passing yards allowed among the 134 teams in the NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision.

But UCLA’s defense showed signs of improvement in the second half against Oregon on Saturday. After UCLA gave up 28 points in the first half, Oregon went scoreless in the third quarter and allowed just one touchdown in the final 30 minutes.

Malloe attributed this improvement to going back to basics and playing with fewer distractions.

“I think what worked in this neighborhood was simplicity. It was really about lining up, playing football and then being able to execute our technique,” ​​Malloe said. “I think in the fourth quarter our technique fell apart a little bit, whether it was because of the amount of body hits they were taking and ultimately, you know, the aggressiveness of what Oregon was doing. But the third quarter, like you said, is something we have to hold on to and kind of move forward.”

Addison was also a bright spot on Saturday. The former Duck had the play of the day for his new team, returning an interception 96 yards for a touchdown to end the first half.

It was his first career pick-six and his fifth interception overall.

“It’s a dream of mine to make a play like that, but I feel like that play wouldn’t just happen against Oregon. It was one of those things we prepared for as a team,” Addison said.

“He was great, but I knew he would play like that. I think that was a very emotional game for him, you know, because of his past and his transfer status from Oregon,” Malloe said of Addison. “I think he’s taken a big step, not only in playing out his position, but also in kind of moving forward and now being one of the leaders of the defense.”

Changes in the defensive line

Defensive players Cherif Seye and Luke Schuermann, who hadn’t played much this season, were in action against Oregon on Saturday. It was the first game for Seye and the second appearance for Schürmann this season.

While the wait continues to see if Ocean’s 14 will actually happen, two of the stars from the original heist trilogy recently reunited for a different kind of crime disaster. Brad Pitt and George Clooney now star in “Wolfs,” available to watch with an Apple TV+ subscription, about two professional fixers who are forced to work together on the same job. Although the film’s critical reception is mixed with that of CinemaBlend Wolves With a rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, the film has already reached an important milestone on Apple TV+. Let’s go Wolves 2which has actually already been given the green light.

Per deadline, Wolves has become the most-watched film in Apple TV+ history, and this comes just days after its premiere in 2024. Although the streamer didn’t provide specific numbers, the publication was told that the Pitt and Clooney-directed film is “growing viewership the service increased by almost 30% week on week”. Wolves premiered in over 100 countries on September 27th and appears to have seen particularly large increases in viewership in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Italy, Mexico, Brazil and Germany.

The Windows 11 2024 Update, also known as Windows 11 24H2, the annual Windows update, is now available for download. After months of testing the update in beta channels, Microsoft today released the new software upgrade to the public. It is the biggest update in the last two years.

Windows 11 24H2 is a feature-rich update and offers a variety of new useful features and improvements. If you want to try out the new exciting features on your PC, here is how you can download and update your PC to the Windows 11 24H2 update right away.

Microsoft has released the expected Windows 11 24H2 update with a large list of AI features including Live Captions, Cocreator in Paint, Image Creator and Restyle Image, Windows Studio Effects, Auto Super Resolution and more.

The update brings WiFi 7 support, Bluetooth LE audio improvements for supporting header devices, taskbar and taskbar improvements, an improved file explorer, smart power management, sudo support for Windows, and many other privacy-focused features.

Here is the full changelog that comes with the Windows 11 24H2 update.

• Exclusive features of Copilot+ PCs:
  • Live subtitles
  • Co-creator in Paint
  • Windows Studio Effects
  • Automatic super resolution
  • Image creator and redesign image
• Wi-Fi 7 support
• Bluetooth® LE audio enhancements to support assistive hearing aids
• Taskbar and taskbar improvements
• A more optimized file explorer
• Intelligent energy management for your PC
• Join and share Wi-Fi networks using QR codes
• Advanced privacy controls for Wi-Fi network access
• Effortless account management and notifications in Microsoft Teams
• Expand speech intelligibility across all devices
• Sudo for Windows: Increase the efficiency of the Windows command line
• Remote Desktop: improved connectivity and accessibility

Download the Windows 11 24H2 update now

Microsoft says: “The Windows 11 24H2 update will be available on eligible PCs starting October 1st.” Since this is a phased rollout, it will take some time to reach every Windows 11 PC. If you are in a hurry and want to try out the new features on your system, you can manually download and install the Windows 11 24H2 update. Here’s how you can do that.

How to download Windows 11 24H2 ISO file

The Windows 11 24H2 Update ISO file has been made available for Windows Insiders to download and install on their supported Windows 11 PCs.

1. Open your preferred web browser, navigate to this page, and sign in with your Windows Insider account.
2. Scroll down until you see “Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) file” and select Windows 11 (Multi-Edition ISO for x64 devices).
3. Click the “Download Now” button to start downloading.
4. You will be asked to select your preferred language. Just do that. Once this is done, the Windows 11 24H2 ISO file will start downloading on your PC.

The download size of the update is approximately 5.4 GB. Of course, depending on your internet speed, downloading the update will take some time.

Install the Windows 11 24H2 update

1. Once the download is complete, navigate to the folder where the download was downloaded.
2. Select the ISO, right-click and select Mount.
3. Now open the provided folder and double click on the setup.exe file.
4. The setup for Windows 11 24H2 will now open and you can continue installing the update on your system.
5. Installing the update on your PC may take some time.
6. Once the setup is complete and your system has restarted a few times, the Windows 11 24H2 update will run.

You can easily install the 24H2 Windows 11 Update on your PC. If you don’t want to follow this manual installation, you can wait a few more weeks until the update is released for your system. If you want to know more about this new 24H2 update and what’s new it brings to Windows 11, you can read it here.

Related articles: