BTEUP Results 2024: How to Check?

Step 1: Visit the official website of BTEUP at bteup.ac.in

Step 2. Click on the “Result” section.

Step 3. Select the appropriate course and exam type (probably “Scrutiny Odd Semester December – 2023”).

Step 4. Enter your student number and date of birth.

Step 5. Click “Search” to view your results.

Step 6: Download the PDF trademark sheet for your records.

BTEUP Results 2024: Insights

The Board of Technical Education Uttar Pradesh (BTEUP) has announced the results of the odd semester examinations conducted in December 2023. The results span several categories:

• UFM Odd Semester December

• UFM Special Back Paper December

• Pharmacy Special Back Paper December

• UFM Pharmacy Special Back Paper December

• Reassessment Odd Semester December

• Examination odd semester December

• Odd semester December

• Special background paper December.

Additionally, students who are dissatisfied with their BTEUP results can request a re-evaluation or examination. Examiners re-evaluate the answers by going over them against the answer sheet and can even change the marks they award.

First published: Oct 03, 2024 | 4:00 p.m IS

Apples iPhone 16 The lineup is there, and you may be wondering whether you should go for the $800 base model or pay more for it iPhone 16 Prowhich starts at $1,000.

For the first time in years, Apple’s regular iPhone has received a significant upgrade. The iPhone 16 features two new hardware buttons (the action button and Camera control button), a larger battery, a new ultrawide camera and a new A18 chip. Plus, it will get Apple Intelligence at some point.

But the iPhone 16 Pro also has impressive additions. All three rear cameras are new or new to the phone. The Pro also has a larger screen with thinner bezels, a new processor (Apple’s A18 Pro chip), and unique features like 4K slow-motion video recording at 120 frames per second. Similar to the regular iPhone 16, the Pro has a new camera control button and a larger battery.

Choosing between the iPhone 16 and 16 Pro can be challenging. But here’s a breakdown of the key specs and features for each device to help you make that decision.

See more: Best iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro cases

Prices and storage

The iPhone 16 starts at $800 for 128GB of storage, $900 for 256GB and $1,100 for 512GB. The iPhone 16 Pro starts at $1,000 for 128GB, $1,100 for 256GB, $1,300 for 512GB, and $1,500 for 1TB.

Cameras: The Pro’s big selling point

A main advantage of Apple’s iPhone Pro models is the higher quality camera for photos and videos.

As for the rear cameras, the base model iPhone 16 has a 48-megapixel wide-angle camera and a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, while the 16 Pro has a 48-megapixel wide-angle camera with a larger and faster 48-megapixel image sensor. Ultra wide-angle camera and a 12-megapixel telephoto camera with 5x optical zoom. Both phones feature the same 12-megapixel TrueDepth front camera.

For videos, the iPhone 16 can shoot 4K recordings at 60 frames per second in addition to spatial 1080p videos at 30 frames per second. The 16 Pro has the same spatial video capacity, but can also record in 4K at up to 120 frames per second – bringing slow-motion effects to the iPhone.

See more: Apple iPhone 16 Pro review: Compelling upgrade with my favorite iPhone feature in years

If you want to do more with your camera (or just want to zoom in on a concert without losing quality), the Pro’s premium features might be tempting.

View, size and weight

The iPhone 16 has a 6.1-inch OLED display, while the 16 Pro is 6.3 inches. The 16 has a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Pro has a 120Hz refresh rate, making animations, scrolling and gaming look smoother. Both have a pixel density of 460 ppi and a peak brightness of 2,000 nits.

The iPhone 16 is 5.81 inches tall, 2.82 inches wide and 0.31 inches thick. The 16 Pro’s dimensions aren’t too far off: 5.89 inches high, 2.81 inches wide, and 0.32 inches thick. The Baseline 16 weighs 170g (6 ounces), while the Pro weighs 199g (7.03 ounces). The materials also vary: the iPhone 16 has an aluminum housing, while the 16 Pro is made of titanium alloy.

Both have Dynamic Island as well as an action button and a camera control button.

The iPhone 16 is available in black, white, pink, teal and ultramarine, while the iPhone 16 Pro is available in black titanium, white titanium, natural titanium and desert titanium. All are waterproof and have an IP68 rating.

Both support charging via USB-C. Since there’s no fingerprint sensor, you’ll have to use Face ID or a passcode.

Batteries, processors and software

Apple doesn’t disclose battery capacity, but says the iPhone 16 has up to 22 hours of video playback (18 hours streamed), while the 16 Pro has up to 27 hours of video playback (22 hours streamed). Both feature wired charging (Apple doesn’t disclose the speed) and MagSafe wireless charging at up to 25 watts with a 30-watt adapter or higher. They also support Qi2 charging up to 15 watts.

The 16 is powered by an A18 chip, while the 16 Pro features the more powerful (and aptly named) A18 Pro chip. They each come with iOS 18 and will support Apple Intelligence when it launches later this year.

iPhone 16 and 16 Pro: Which one should you buy?

For the majority of people, the iPhone 16 has more than enough to offer. Its cameras are great for photos and videos. The phone runs iOS 18, features notable updates like customizable home screens and apps, new emoji tapbacks for iMessages, and supports satellite SMS. It even comes in a variety of bright, saturated colors. The iPhone 16’s biggest downside is its screen, which still has a 60Hz refresh rate and looks pretty decent compared to Pro iPhones. If you have an iPhone 13 or older, the iPhone 16 is a wonderful upgrade.

However, if you’re looking for even better cameras with the ability to zoom in closer to subjects, or just want a better viewing experience, the iPhone 16 Pro is worth a look. The phone offers enough amenities and offers creative photographers and filmmakers many artistic options – but at a higher price. If you have an iPhone 12 Pro or older, upgrading to the iPhone 16 Pro makes sense. If you’re carrying an iPhone 13 Pro and running low on battery capacity, it’s also worth considering the 16 Pro. However, if you have an iPhone 14 Pro or 15 Pro, no upgrade is required.

Check this out: Review: Apple’s iPhone 16 Pro is an impressive upgrade

12:06

According to police, the train was arriving at Yau Tong MTR station when the incident occurred at around 8:57 a.m. that day. Firefighters investigated how the lithium battery could have caught fire.

Here’s what you need to know about the potential dangers of devices that use lithium-ion batteries.

1. How widespread are lithium-ion batteries?

A lithium-ion battery is a type of rechargeable battery commonly used in cell phones, laptops, portable power banks, rechargeable fans, e-bikes and certain electric vehicles.

2. What are the signs that you should stop using?

According to the Consumer Council, users should immediately stop using products with lithium-ion batteries and unplug the charger if the batteries are deformed, damaged or overheated.

The US-based Electrical Safety Foundation also recommends users to stop using any device or battery that has an unusual odor, color change or excessive heat. Users should also stop using the device if the battery changes shape, leaks, smokes, or no longer holds a charge. Damaged or overheated batteries could cause a fire, it said.

3. Why do batteries wear out?

According to the Consumer Council, charging and discharging of batteries occurs through a process in which lithium ions diffuse through the electrolyte between the anode and cathode.

However, the lithium ions in the battery slowly react chemically with other substances and are converted into compounds that can neither be charged nor discharged. The resistance of the battery also increases over time, which leads to more heat being generated during charging or discharging. The battery capacity gradually decreases, resulting in a shorter charging time.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is about to venture into uncharted legal territory and decide which of Donald Trump’s alleged election subversion crimes are official acts of an American president and are therefore at least presumably immune from prosecution. The Supreme Court directed Chutkan to wage this unprecedented legal battle by unveiling a doctrine of criminal immunity for a president’s “official acts.” On Tuesday, Trump’s lawyers made a final attempt to prevent the start of this legal maiden voyage. On Wednesday, that attempt failed when a letter from special counsel Jack Smith’s team containing new evidence was released.

To comply with the Supreme Court’s order, Chutkan must see all evidence of Trump’s conduct on and around January 6, 2021. Last week, Smith filed the lengthy motion outlining Trump’s conduct as the basis for the four counts in his criminal complaint. There is also an even longer appendix that contains the evidence (e.g., grand jury transcripts, FBI witness interview records, and the like) that supports the narrative presented in the motion.

Smith has redacted any information from his court filings that would jeopardize ongoing investigations or reveal sensitive or classified information. Chutkan then set two deadlines for Trump’s lawyers: October 1 to object to redactions in the application and October 10 to object to redactions in the appendix materials.

The first motion opposing the redaction of the application was received on Tuesday and was extremely absurd. The tone of the document was less of a sober legal argument and more of an unhinged 2 a.m. social media post (which, for example, said Smith’s filing was a “politically motivated manifesto to the public”). It made three main arguments as to why Smith had completely misunderstood the editors and asked Chutkan not to publish anything before the November election.

Trump’s first argument was that Smith’s positions had been inconsistent over time. Smith previously argued in this case that the evidence should not be made public any sooner than necessary. Now, Trump’s lawyers claimed, Smith is now determined to release evidence against the former president to the public. They insist Smith is doing this to interfere in the upcoming election.

But the reality is that Smith “changed” his position because circumstances changed. The Supreme Court ordered the disclosure of the evidence and the trial. In our criminal justice system, the Sixth Amendment right to a “public trial” means that virtually all litigation is public. According to Trump, Smith should have said, “I don’t care about the Supreme Court” – a ridiculous stance.

Trump’s second complaint was that Smith wanted to disclose the evidence in this case, but in Trump’s prosecution in Florida of unlawfully retaining classified documents, obstruction of justice, and violating our nation’s espionage laws, the special counsel insisted on keeping the evidence secret. Again: phew! These alleged crimes were committed after Trump has left the presidency. So in the Florida case, there is no issue of presidential immunity to be litigated, meaning there is no need to publicly disclose evidence.

Trump’s first two arguments were empty accusations of hypocrisy. The third was just ridiculous. Trump argued that releasing evidence to the public would pose “risks to potential witnesses.” This perceived fear comes from a defendant who has been gagged in both civil and criminal cases to keep him from saying things that could endanger potential witnesses. This complaint stands under the weight of its own frivolity.

On the positive side, Trump’s new court filing has made Chutkan’s job much easier. It was so unconvincing that Chutkan simply set it aside, concluded that Smith’s proposed redactions represented the right balance, and ordered that his motion be placed in the public record so that she could proceed with the litigation that the Supreme Court has assigned it to her.

We can now understand why Trump was so desperate to keep Smith’s file secret from the American people. The motion is essentially a 165-page opening statement containing evidence that sharply and directly incriminates Trump and his co-conspirators. At the start of the briefing, Smith offers this eloquent summary:

The former president’s frivolous statement of claim disregarded the legal process. But for the rest of us, it was good news: Trump may have inadvertently hastened the day when he finally stands trial for his democracy-destroying crimes of January 6th.

By Jess Sharp, Money Team

Traditionally, financial power in a household rests with the parents, who decide how the money is spent, pay the bills and, if they’re lucky enough, put some of it away in an emergency fund.

However, according to research, young children are gradually becoming the “most influential financial forces” in their families.

Generation Alpha, born from 2010 onwards, is earning and saving more than ever before and is encouraging their parents to do the same, prepaid debit card app GoHenry’s latest Youth Economy report has found.

With nearly one in 10 children already saving for a house, their proactive approach to money encourages parents to also think more carefully about how much they save.

One in five parents said their children influenced them to save more. Two-thirds said they discovered and purchased new brands thanks to their children using companies that align with their values.

GoHenry has discovered that part of Generation Alpha’s financial fortunes can be attributed to social media. Many children have grown up watching bedroom businesses boom online.

One in three children have already started a part-time job or are planning to do so, with 29% motivated to do so in order to save in the future.

Combined, the generation has spending power of £3.3 billion, the report said.

Last year, children aged between six and 14 earned £193 million and saved £20.5 million in savings, the report said.

Here are some of the top ways they spent their money through GoHenry:

• PlayStation proved to be the top shop for Gen Alpha, with a total spend of £3.9 million last year.
• Online giant Amazon is also in the top 10 with a total spend of £2.3m;
• Shein led the online fashion space with total spend of £1.5m;
• The generation also spent more than £3 million on food delivery services;
• Girls spent £4 million on health and beauty products.

What impact could Generation Alpha have on the economy as they get older?

Louise Hill, CEO and co-founder of GoHenry, told the Money team that Generation Alpha is already “shaking things up” and has the potential to become the “most economically powerful generation” ever.

“Gen Alpha is quickly becoming the most influential financial force in their households. By influencing their parents to budget more effectively and spend more responsibly, these children are changing the face of family finances,” she said.

“What’s particularly exciting is their future-oriented approach to money – whether it’s saving for something special or even starting a part-time job, they show us what smart financial habits look like.”

She explained that a solid financial education is crucial to achieving her potential.

“The older they get, the greater their impact on the economy and retail – particularly on the way we think about purchases, including more sustainable shopping,” Ms Hill added.

“Gen Alpha knows what she wants and she pushes her families to support brands that align with her values.

“For brands looking to connect with this generation, social media is the way to go.”

Thursday marks the first anniversary of the defining moment for Republicans in the House of Representatives this legislative session: They removed the speaker they had spent 15 rounds of voting to install just nine months earlier. The decision to oust California Rep. Kevin McCarthy wasn’t a great campaign performance — especially not for GOP members looking to secure a second term. But there hasn’t been much in the last two years that makes a good case for giving Republicans another chance at the majority next year.

And yet that’s exactly what House Republicans are doing right now: giving themselves a break from the hard work they haven’t put into campaigning over the next few weeks. Despite what a miserable disaster the last two years have been, about two dozen incumbent Republicans are trying to convince Americans that they deserve to remain in the majority in the 119th Congress. It is a level of boldness that should be disqualifying, not rewarded with another two years of mediocrity and, at worst, enabling the end of democracy in a second Trump administration.

While McCarthy’s ignoble retirement from the speakership was a low point, the House majority didn’t exactly spend the rest of its time covering itself in glory. With only a lame-duck session left after the election, and with it another spending fight, no major legislative push is planned to take advantage of these final weeks. Accordingly, the 118th Congress will go down in history for enacting the fewest laws in modern history.

The best thing that can be said about the House of Representatives over the last two years is that it has kept the lights on in Washington – barely. There have been five shutdown threats during that time as Republicans spent more time arguing among themselves over spending levels than debating with Democrats in the Senate and President Joe Biden in the White House. That total includes the one that got McCarthy expelled after he approved a short-term spending bill that his right wing opposed. However, he was already on thin ice as he decided to avoid default by agreeing to raise the debt ceiling in April 2023.

The outrage over protecting the full faith and credit of the United States has focused on a group of far-right MAGA members that I have dubbed the “Chaos Caucus.” Her maximalist attitude was a headache for both McCarthy and his successor as speaker, Mike Johnson of Louisiana, both of whom tried to placate her mercurial moods. As a result, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., has at times struggled to pass even routine measures to clear the way for what are essentially news laws.

In fact, much of the credit for even the simplest tasks goes to the minority Democrats who were willing to step in and save the Republicans from themselves. One of the few major pieces of legislation passed this legislative session was a funding package to support Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. It was pushed across the finish line without the majority of the GOP caucus ensuring that the bills could even be debated. Also missing was the immigration bill, which Republicans initially called for to be included in any relief package, but then stalled at the urging of former President Donald Trump.

Even things nominally under Republican control failed to coalesce into anything substantial. Their promise to restore “normal order” and pass all 12 annual spending bills on time has hit a wall again, with no real effort from Democrats to stop them. Likewise, their efforts to find a pretext for impeaching Biden ended in dismal failure in the form of a lackluster report released after he ended his campaign. But since the House Oversight Committee apparently has nothing better to do, it has set out to search for Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

This new fishing expedition against the Democrats takes place in a leaky boat, with nothing but frayed lines and almost no dangling bait. If something truly damaging comes along, it’s more likely to be a coincidence than a ploy by Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky. That is, the house did They manage to indict Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on false charges, but he remains in office. The same cannot be said for former Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., whom the House of Representatives was actually able to expel after taking into account the numerous crimes he committed in the process of running for his seat.

This is the absolute mess that Republicans snuck back into their districts to sell to voters when the House recessed last week. Only thanks to partisan gerrymandering and the rightward shift of the GOP primaries will most of those who voted for re-election find themselves back in Washington next year. The few representatives in swing districts are essentially on their own, figuring out what message they can convey to old-fashioned voters who expect results from their congressmen.

Aside from their general disinterest in governing, Republicans have good reasons to feel comfortable with their boldness. As The New York Times recently noted, “Lawmakers benefit from the fact that the bar is set very low: Polls show that the vast majority of voters have said for years that they have a poor opinion of Congress and think it is already broken.” So it’s clear that the GOP’s core voters not only agree with the current situation, but also want members who continue to operate according to the same fiddly formula. How lucky for the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives – and how unfortunate for everyone hoping that Congress gets something done next year.

Your Amazon Prime Video experience is about to get a little worse in the coming weeks and months, as the company announced Wednesday that it plans to increase the number of ads shown on the streaming service.

According to a report by The Financial TimesThe changes will come into effect early next year. However, there is little further detail on how many more will be made available and where they might appear. It will start with “a very small amount” of advertising, said Kelly Day, vice president of Prime Video International FTand that the company is seeking a “soft entry into advertising.”

“We know it was a bit of a contrarian approach,” Day said. “But it actually went much better than we even expected.” Namely, because the company has not seen a “boom in waves of churn or cancellations” since it began running interstitial advertising on Prime Video in January 2024. At the time, Amazon claimed that the Running ads “would allow us to continue to invest in compelling content and continue to grow that investment over a long period of time.”

The company expanded its onscreen advertising in May by adding it to the pause screen, and is currently planning to introduce a feature in the near future that will allow you to add items to your cart directly from the video stream. You can remove advertising for the service you already pay between $9 and $15 for each month by adding an extra $3 to each bill.

Many video streaming services have moved from their original ad-free models to an ad-supported format, where they also display advertising in addition to charging a monthly fee. Netflix, for example, eliminated its $12 ad-free plan in July and replaced it with an ad-supported plan that costs $7 per month. Hulu, on the other hand, has always had advertising.

The approach has certainly worked for Amazon, as the company received more than $1.8 billion in endorsements at a preview event in September. The company estimates it will generate up to $4 billion in advertising revenue in 2025.

Source: Financial Times

Before a briefing Wednesday in Augusta, Georgia, Vice President Kamala Harris thanked officials for their work in response and recovery efforts after Hurricane Helene.

In her remarks, Harris thanked “all the people who are here on the ground doing this extraordinary work.”

“I have read and heard about the work you have done over the last few days and I think it truly represents the best that we all know can be done, particularly as we engage locally, coordinate at the state level and federal resources to meet the needs of people who need to be seen and heard,” she said.

“These are very difficult times and in a moment of crisis I think that really brings out the best in us. And you all embody this important and good work,” Harris added. “So, I’m here to thank you and listen to you.”

Click here for more details on Biden and Harris’ trips to the South.

-Fritz Farrow, Gabriella Abdul-Hakim and Will McDuffie from ABC News

When Pauley Perrette said she had no plans to return to acting, she meant it.

The former actress was once a popular TV star thanks to her long-running role as forensic scientist Abby Sciuto on the CBS series NCISexplained her decision to step away from the spotlight in a new interview with Hello! “I’m not ungrateful for the benefits it’s brought me, but I’m a different person now and I want to be there for it all – the good, the bad and the painful,” she said. “I want to be myself all the time, and it takes a lot of courage to tell myself that, but it’s authentic to how I feel.”

Perrette was cast NCIS in 2003 after working as an actor for almost a decade on projects like The Drew Carey Show, Veronica’s Closet, Jesse, Almost Famous And time of your life. Her NCIS She starred in “Run” for an impressive 15 seasons with 352 episodes from 2003 to 2018. Around the time of her departure, Perrette filed assault or felony charges. She later took aim at co-star Mark Harmon by saying she felt unsafe around him.

CBS TV Studios responded at the time: “Pauley Perrette had a great run NCIS and we will all miss them. Over a year ago, Pauley came to us with a workplace issue. We took the matter seriously and worked with her to find a solution. We are committed to providing a safe work environment at all of our shows.”

An oral history published last September by The Hollywood Reporter shed more light on what really happened. “In the case of Pauley Perrette, there was an incident involving the show with a dog. The dog belonged to Harmon and apparently the dog bit someone,” executive producer Charles Floyd Johnson revealed. “Pauley was a huge SPCA [Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals] Animal Man. And then the dog kept coming with Harmon and she felt like he wasn’t safe for the show. At the end of the year she just felt like it wasn’t working for her anymore and it was time to move on.”

Perrette starred in the short-lived TV series Brokewhich lasted 13 episodes and ended in 2020. She subsequently announced that she would be retiring from acting. Perrette remains committed to causes close to her heart and is credited as an executive producer of the documentary Studio One forever, about the legendary gay nightclub in LA.

As it turns out, it’s no coincidence that her latest film is a documentary. “At this point in my life I feel a deep need to find authenticity in everything and being an actor, especially at certain points in my life, has been a great escape; It’s like a drug because I didn’t have to be myself, I could be someone else,” she told the publication. “My character didn’t have all the problems that I had. That’s why I only watch documentaries, I want the truth. For me, returning to acting would mean a loss of real authenticity, which I live 100 percent.”

“Unsolved Mysteries” is once again met with backlash: Netflix viewers criticize season 5, episode 2, among other things, for its focus on the supernatural.

Here’s the deal: The documentary series itself, which began back in 1987, was always about true crime, but also conspiracy theories and unexplained paranormal phenomena like ghosts and UFOs.

But after rebooting on Netflix in 2020, the latest volumes of Unsolved Mysteries have come under fire.

Firstly, viewers were not happy that the final episodes were split into two parts and the fourth season contained five episodes instead of the usual nine.

Two of the episodes dealt with well-known cases – Jack the Ripper and The Mothman – which also caused a stir.

“I was surprised I didn’t see an Alien episode to skip, but now there were these two instead,” someone said on Reddit.

But it seems that the makers have saved the paranormal stories for the fifth season of Unsolved Mysteries, with only the first episode focusing on a true crime case.

Episode 2, “My Paranormal Partner,” follows paranormal researcher Don Philips, who claims to be able to talk to ghosts, investigate hauntings, and bring peace to those whose lives have been affected by ghosts.

Philips’ work led to a rather unusual relationship: collaboration with an entity named Becky, who communicates with him and accompanies him in his work and private life.

Although parapsychologist and skeptic Steve Mera wasn’t sure whether Philips’ claims were true, his opinion is beginning to change after a series of tests.

But even though he believes Philips, Becky’s identity and the rest of her communications come into question.

Meanwhile, Episode 3 deals with a series of unexplained livestock mutilations, while the finale revisits the infamous UFO incident in Roswell.

In a Reddit thread about Unsolved Mysteries season 5, one viewer wrote, “It feels kind of disrespectful to put these silly ghost stories (Episode 2) on the same level as real unsolved murder cases.”

Another agreed, declaring: “Like episode 1, it’s fine. But if you only have four episodes and three of them are paranormal, then come on. That’s no secret.

Netflix

Steve Mera wasn’t initially convinced by Don Philips

“I always appreciate a Roswell story, but it was done and they didn’t have to cover it here. The Becky episode is just complete… nonsense.”

“Agreed,” a third added. “I decided to stop watching Becky after ten minutes. I moved on to Episode 3.”

However, others jumped in to defend the streaming service’s relaunch. “It’s not about ‘unsolved murders’, it’s about ‘unsolved mysteries.’ That’s what cold case files are for,” said one.

Another commented: “I mean… the original series also had silly alien stories and stuff. This is nothing new.”

But a Redditor made another post about why he’s unhappy with the latest chapters. “I loved the reboot of the first season. But man, it’s gone downhill,” they explained.

“Volume 4 had two sorts of throwaway covers that many people didn’t like. (Tbh, I didn’t mind the Jack the Ripper case BUT it was a repeat). Now Volume 5 – Garbage. Four episodes and seriously three of them are throwaways for me.

“I didn’t mind that there were paranormal/extraterrestrial cases in the original – BUT they were short segments.

“A whole hour about these paranormal/extraterrestrial cases is just a waste and I don’t think I’ll continue watching. I’m not interested. I was so disappointed… it had so much potential.”

A second replied: “I’m only interested in missing persons or murder cases. I have no interest in the paranormal/aliens. I’ll skip them.”

“I had incredibly high hopes and like you said, the first season was excellent. So many cases I had never heard of before,” added a third.

“Now they make us wait YEARS between seasons and then throw in four or five episodes of well-known, high-profile events like Roswell and Jack The Ripper.”

Despite the disappointment many feel, the first episode, “Park Bench Murders,” has sparked much discussion.

The case involves the unsolved 2019 murders of Carnell Sledge and Katherine Brown, two friends who were shot in the back of the head as they sat together on a bench at the Cleveland Metroparks’ Rocky River Reservation.

Netflix

Katherine Brown and Carnell Sledge were killed in 2019

Although it happened in broad daylight on a busy highway, there were no witnesses or signs that it was a robbery.

Series creator Terry Dunn Meurer told Netflix’s Tudum: “This double murder is everyone’s worst nightmare. It happened in broad daylight in a very busy public park.

“Law enforcement has been unable to determine a motive for the murders and has no suspects. This case needs the help of viewers.”

On Reddit, one viewer wrote: “Usually on this show there always seems to be an opportunity to come up with your own theories, but I’m pretty stumped on this one.”

“The information I obtained from the documentary is insufficient to even speculate as all possible suspects have verifiable alibis,” they added.

“That makes me lean towards a hate crime or a completely random attack.”

Another added: “This is as close to the definition of a crime thriller as you can get.”

“I feel really sorry for both their families and the fact that the killer got away and put the families at odds (Nell’s family thought it had something to do with Kate and vice versa) just doesn’t sit well with me.” “

For more true crime news, check out where the Menendez brothers are now, where Janel Grant is now, and what true crime stories the Monster Makers should cover next.