Cruelty-Free vs. Traditional Beauty: Which Do You Use?

The beauty industry offers consumers a lot of choice. To support cruelty-free brands or traditional brands that may still test on animals. In South Africa, consumers have a variety of options available, leading to a broader discussion about personal values, ethics and beauty standards.

The rise of cruelty-free brands

Cruelty-free products are those that have not been tested on animals. Many consumers are drawn to these brands not only because of their ethical stance, but also because of their commitment to sustainability and natural ingredients. Popular cruelty-free brands in South Africa include:

• Lush: Lush is known for its fresh, handcrafted cosmetics, actively opposes animal testing and promotes ethical practices.
• The body shop: The Body Shop has long advocated for cruelty-free policies, focusing on fair trade and sustainable sourcing.
• Skoon skin care: This local brand emphasizes natural ingredients and eco-friendly packaging, appealing to consumers who value both ethics and sustainability.
• Phoera: Phoera is known for its high-quality, cruelty-free makeup products and is very popular among beauty enthusiasts.
• TruLab: TruLab offers a range of cruelty-free skin care products and is committed to ethical beauty.
• Skin cream: Skin Creamery focuses on natural, organic skin care and prides itself on cruelty-free practices and sustainable ingredients.

For many, choosing cruelty-free brands is about more than just personal preference. It reflects a commitment to compassion and ethical treatment of animals.

A case for traditional brands

On the other side of the debate are traditional brands that may still be testing on animals. Quite a few of them have been campaigning for years to stop animal testing. Many of these brands only do this due to various country regulations. Others need to provide data that they can use to defend themselves if they are sued by consumers. Some well-known names are:

• Eucerin: Eucerin is known for its dermatologist-recommended skin care solutions and conducts extensive research, which may include animal testing.
• clinic: Clinique is a trusted brand for many. Clinique’s products are effective, although not all lines are cruelty-free.
• Level: Popular for its moisturizing product. Although they do not test finished products on animals, it is possible to test products on animals if required by law.
• Garnier: While Garnier is expanding its cruelty-free range, it still has products that do not meet cruelty-free standards.
• Revlon: Revlon, known for its cosmetics, is a traditional brand that has not yet fully transitioned to cruelty-free practices.

Consumers who prefer these brands often cite effectiveness, availability and reputation as reasons for their loyalty.

The beauty product landscape in South Africa offers a wide range of choices, from cruelty-free advocates like Lush and The Body Shop to traditional brands like Eucerin and Clinique. As consumers become more informed about the ethical implications of their purchases, the industry will continue to evolve. Whether one prioritizes cruelty-free practices or opts for traditional testing methods, understanding the impact of these decisions is critical in today’s beauty market.

Want to advertise on The Daily Pod or Nuusflits? Contact [email protected].

Also read: Discover 5 luxury hotels in Johannesburg